Save only the register the next sequence still needs.
Instruction-sequence need and modification sets can decide when composed code must protect an earlier register value with save and restore.
Guiding question
When does a compiler need to preserve a register between two instruction sequences?
Read register needs and modifications as sequence contracts
Detect a value needed after an earlier sequence overwrites it
Insert save and restore only around that conflict
Update the composed sequence contract after preservation
A conflict exists when the second sequence needs the incoming value of a register and the first sequence modifies that register. Preserving wraps the first statements with save and restore so the second sequence sees the original value.
The wrapped first sequence now needs the register in order to save it and no longer exposes that register as modified after restore. If either side of the conflict is absent, composition emits no stack instructions.
The first program returns a sequence that needs (env), modifies (val), and surrounds the first statements with (save env) and (restore env). The second returns (#t #f).
Trace focus
Follow both membership checks before the sequence is wrapped. Then inspect how difference removes env from the exposed modification set while the emitted statement list gains save and restore.
Try it yourself
Change the program and compare the result.
Change the second sequence so it needs only val. Predict the composed need and modification sets and whether any save or restore remains.
Show hint
Without env in the second need set, preserving takes the ordinary append-sequences branch.